All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
	Laurent <laurent@augias.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: read_proc issue
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:44:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020227144442.Y31381@host171.fsmlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020227140432.L20918@boardwalk> <E16gBps-0005wa-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16gBps-0005wa-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:42:04PM +0000

That's a good solution in the general case but doesn't work for
some of the proc entries that already exist.  cpuinfo, for example.
There seem to be a number of niche /proc methods already.  A cache-on-open
method would be very useful for files like cpuinfo and a number of other
files for PPC.

It sure would make accessing /proc files less whacky for user-code.

} Another approach is to do the calculation open and remember it in per
} fd private data. You can recover that and free it on release. It could
} even be a buffer holding the actual "content"

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-27 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 18:21 read_proc issue Laurent
2002-02-27 19:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-02-27 21:04   ` Val Henson
2002-02-27 21:42     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-27 21:44       ` Cort Dougan [this message]
2002-02-28  0:05       ` Erik Mouw
2002-02-27  3:19         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-01  7:14           ` Erik Mouw
2002-03-01  7:47             ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-01  8:18               ` Laurent
2002-03-01  8:18                 ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-01 19:49               ` Cort Dougan
2002-02-27 23:32     ` Laurent
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-27  0:51 Thomas Hood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020227144442.Y31381@host171.fsmlabs.com \
    --to=cort@fsmlabs.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=laurent@augias.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=val@nmt.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.