All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Malcolm Mallardi <magamo@ranka.2y.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18 vs 2.4.17 DVD video preformance problem?
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:08:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020304090819.A4087@trianna.upcommand.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020304072054.A12646@trianna.upcommand.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020304072054.A12646@trianna.upcommand.net>; from magamo@ranka.2y.net on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:20:54AM -0500

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:20:54AM -0500, Malcolm Mallardi wrote:
> 	Heyla folks.  I hit a snag while using 2.4.18 for the first
> time the other day.... When I played DVDs under it, there would be a
> large amount of 'skips' in comparison to 2.4.17.  I know, not much of a
> bug report, as I think the bug may have already been addressed.
> 	The reason I say this is that my DVD-ROM drive is on the
> secondary IDE channel of a PIIX4 chipset.  Under 2.4.17 playback
> preformance is nearly perfect.  Could these "PIIX4 slave timing" fixes
> that I've been reading about in a few of the newer changelogs be what
> I'm looking for?  I'm going to track down one of the newer patches
> (probably -pre2-ac1) and try it out and see if that gives better
> preformance for me.
> 

	Tested things out under 2.4.19-pre2  Something y'all did in
there fixed it up nicely.

--
Malcolm D. Mallardi - Dark Freak At Large
"Captain, we are receiving two-hundred eighty-five THOUSAND hails."
AOL: Nuark  UIN: 11084092 Y!: Magamo Jabber: Nuark@jabber.com
http://ranka.2y.net:3000/~magamo/index.htm

      reply	other threads:[~2002-03-04 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-04 12:20 2.4.18 vs 2.4.17 DVD video preformance problem? Malcolm Mallardi
2002-03-04 14:08 ` Malcolm Mallardi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020304090819.A4087@trianna.upcommand.net \
    --to=magamo@ranka.2y.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.