From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Manegeability with LVM Message-Id: <20020305141737.GE12970@tykepenguin.com> References: <20020304223441.GA3489@localhost> <1015288381.24623.11.camel@UberGeek> <20020305114126.A5997@golem.blacknet.de> <20020305122638.A16411@sistina.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Mar 5 08:17:01 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:11AM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Heinz" == Heinz J writes: > > Heinz> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Goetz Bock wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 04 '02 at 18:33, Austin Gonyou wrote: > >> > XFS does support shriking..but not with LVM. > >> How come, LVM is just an other block device, isn't it? > > Heinz> Right. If you could shrink an XFS filesystem, you can shrink > Heinz> the logical volume afterwards. > > Heinz> I must have missed that one: since when does XFS support > Heinz> shrinking? > > It doesn't... Does it support "shriking" though :^) patrick