From: Tim <tim@connectlive.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM/RAID again
Date: Wed Mar 6 17:13:01 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020306181319.C12548@connectlive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020306203532.GA622@human.galaxy>; from frank.lenaerts@advalvas.be on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:35:32PM +0100
Having used and despised VxVM on Solaris before, and finding out about
Heartbeat since then, I'd look into attached enclosures shared
physically on a SCSI bus (there is an article in SysAdmin magazine that
I used for my starting point) and serial heartbeats across the nodes, if
the cluster is simple enough... if not post to the linux-HA list :-)
Quoth Frank Lenaerts:
> I've been reading several LVM/RAID postings on this mailinglist to
> find out if someone else is also having the same question as I have,
> but this does not seem to be the case; I hope this is the right place
> to ask this.
>
> As LVM does not provide RAID1 (etc.) as VXVM does with its plexes, I
> wanted to use LVM on top of the standard Linux metadevices
> (RAID1). However, I wanted to do this for a cluster system using a
> shared SCSI bus. I am aware of the fact that ownership of disks is
> important, while something like LVM actually tries to abstract this
> away, but I want to use LVM to be able to extend the filesystem, to
> take snapshot backups etc.. The problem I currently face however, is
> the fact that both nodes autodetect the metadevices and start syncing
> the mirrors, independently of each other (I do not have the LVM and
> cluster software installed on these machines yet). The synchronization
> however, is initiated by the raidstart command, that is true (it is
> not the detection itself which does this), but I wonder how I should
> solve this problem. Below, some ideas that come to my mind:
>
> - do not use LVM at all, just use the physical disks instead
>
> - have two separate raidtab files where each of them is only "owned"
> by a single node (to prevent syncing problems) and only start the
> raid for a certain metadevice when a logical volume is imported on a
> node
>
> What do you think about this?
>
> --
> frank.lenaerts@advalvas.be
--
"To be suspended from the legal profession is the moral equivalent of
being ostracized by child molesters."
--Ian Rowan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-06 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-06 14:35 [linux-lvm] LVM/RAID again Frank Lenaerts
2002-03-06 17:13 ` Tim [this message]
2002-03-06 18:16 ` Luca Berra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020306181319.C12548@connectlive.com \
--to=tim@connectlive.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.