From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] System Suggestions Message-Id: <20020306224207.GD1353@localhost> References: <20020306210600.JKKL21197.imf11bis.bellsouth.net@taz> <1015450169.3240.80.camel@Steven> <3C869076.7010607@birddog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3C869076.7010607@birddog.com> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Mar 6 16:41:02 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Wednesday, 06 March 2002, at 15:56:06 -0600, Kirby C. Bohling wrote: > Steven Critchfield wrote: > >On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:59, Greg Freemyer wrote: > > > >Although my first thought is to write RH and remind them how much we > [...] > I forgot something important in my last email :). 2.4.18-rc4aa1 also seems to include newer LVM code than mainline, namely: LVM version 1.0.2(23/01/2002) module loaded So 2.4.18-rc4aa1 could provide you with everything you need in just one patch, not two (not a great advantage, but maybe XFS and LVM patches conflict somewhere, and you avoid that). -- Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Woody (Linux 2.4.18-rc4aa1) jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk