From: Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jurgen Botz <jurgen@botz.org>, Thomas Hood <jdthood@mail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SSSCA: We're in trouble now
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:56:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020306235627.GD32504@auctionwatch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020306050010.GK22934@auctionwatch.com> <E16ieUY-0007MG-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16ieUY-0007MG-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 04:42:14PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Just about every company big enough to have a corporate lawyer, and
> > many even smaller do have "media" they need or want to track and
> > control.
>
> One thing the SSSCA people must consider here is security impact. If a
Huh?
We're talking politicians here.
We're talking about the kind of people who try to pass a law setting
pi=3.14159 FULL STOP.
They don't have to consider jack shit.
> document can be traced through its users then the ability of agencies to
> work against organised crime will be crippled. The SSSCA appears to have no
> provision to allow the FBI to remove watermarks, and makes it illegalf or
> other people to be subcontracted to write the tools
> Goodbye corporate whistleblowers, goodbye FBI plants in organised crime
> bodies..
They don't care about whistleblowers, and FBI agents can always used
fake personalities.
--
Share and Enjoy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-06 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-02 0:21 SSSCA: We're in trouble now Thomas Hood
2002-03-02 8:35 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-02 17:34 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2002-03-04 8:30 ` Helge Hafting
2002-03-04 9:40 ` Martin Eriksson
2002-03-04 17:02 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 4:41 ` Petro
2002-03-06 9:27 ` Helge Hafting
2002-03-02 15:30 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-03-02 21:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-03 1:29 ` Greg Louis
2002-03-06 4:51 ` Petro
2002-03-02 17:47 ` Jurgen Botz
2002-03-06 5:00 ` Petro
2002-03-06 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 18:24 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 23:56 ` Petro [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-06 17:20 Ed Vance
2002-03-06 18:31 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-04 19:27 Jesse Pollard
2002-03-01 19:46 Paul G. Allen
2002-03-01 20:27 ` Shawn Starr
2002-03-01 20:30 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-03-01 21:29 ` Shawn Starr
2002-03-01 22:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-02 3:08 ` Neale Banks
2002-03-02 3:03 ` eddantes
2002-03-02 18:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01 22:47 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-02 2:59 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 4:26 ` Petro
2002-03-06 4:41 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-03-06 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-06 17:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-06 18:16 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 18:35 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-03-07 22:54 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-08 2:12 ` Tom Rauschenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020306235627.GD32504@auctionwatch.com \
--to=petro@auctionwatch.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jdthood@mail.com \
--cc=jurgen@botz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.