From: Andreas Ferber <aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Danek Duvall <duvall@emufarm.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: root-owned /proc/pid files for threaded apps?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:37:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020310213706.A673@devcon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020307060110.GA303@lorien.emufarm.org> <E16iyBW-0002HP-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20020308100632.GA192@lorien.emufarm.org> <20020308195939.A6295@devcon.net> <20020308203157.GA457@lorien.emufarm.org> <20020308222942.A7163@devcon.net> <20020308214148.GA750@lorien.emufarm.org> <20020308233001.B7163@devcon.net> <20020309030937.GA244@lorien.emufarm.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020309030937.GA244@lorien.emufarm.org>; from duvall@emufarm.org on Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:09:37PM -0800
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:09:37PM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote:
> Ok, after trying all four combinations (call to wmb() moved or not, and
> set_user(0, 1) vs set_user(0, 0)), it turns out all four exhibit
> skipping, so that's unrelated (in fact, it seems to happen not on net
> access, but on redraw -- mozilla's dialogs make xmms skip, too).
OK, so it's clearly unrelated.
> I'll leave it for someone else to decide what arguments to set_user()
> exec_usermodehelper() should pass.
Clearing dumpable at this point is obviously wrong as it always has
side-effects on the process that was leading into the module request.
It's also unnecessary, as it /only/ has effect on the /old/ mm_struct,
before doing the execve() of the usermode helper. As request_module
and friends don't introduce sensitive data into the address space of
the calling process, leaving dumpable alone is just fine.
So, IMO, set_user(0, 0) should be the way to go.
Andreas
--
Andreas Ferber - dev/consulting GmbH - Bielefeld, FRG
---------------------------------------------------------
+49 521 1365800 - af@devcon.net - www.devcon.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-10 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-07 6:01 root-owned /proc/pid files for threaded apps? Danek Duvall
2002-03-07 7:43 ` Danek Duvall
2002-03-07 13:43 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 10:06 ` Danek Duvall
2002-03-08 13:33 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 18:59 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-08 20:31 ` Danek Duvall
2002-03-08 21:29 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-08 21:41 ` Danek Duvall
2002-03-08 22:30 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-09 3:09 ` Danek Duvall
2002-03-10 20:37 ` Andreas Ferber [this message]
2002-03-08 21:47 ` J Sloan
2002-03-08 21:59 ` Danek Duvall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020310213706.A673@devcon.net \
--to=aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=duvall@emufarm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.