From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: andrew may <acmay@acmay.homeip.net>
Cc: Armin <akuster@pacbell.net>, John Tyner <jtyner@cs.ucr.edu>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] early serial init
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:03:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020412000341.GM759@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020411162849.F18158@ecam.san.rr.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:28:49PM -0700, andrew may wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:10:56PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:36:42PM -0700, andrew may wrote:
> >
> > > This patch is to remove the need for the BASE BAUD define.
> >
> > Only if you get this information from somewhere else, yes? This isn't
> > currently something we grab from OpenBIOS, or could, right?
>
> If you look at the patch you see the only thing we need to know is the clock
> rate of the CPU. Then you can to a mfdcr() to calc the base baud. If there
> is an external clock then we need the basebaud from somewhere else.
Ah, right..
[snip]
> > More seriously, if someone wants to try and do that there's lots of
> > other things which would need to be changed first.
>
> Yes there is a lot of work to do, but I would like to see it happen.
> Right now we have to do seperate builds for our custum board and one for
> our Walnut boards and that is a pain.
I assume once the custom HW is 'ready', you'll be able to stop doing
that tho. I think you'll spend more time trying to get everything just
right than you would building 2 kernels a few times (I bet much of the
pain comes from the current kbuild crap. You might wanna play w/ the
current kbuild-2.5 stuff if you're going to pick a kernel rev & stay for
a while, it gets the deps right so you only recompile the needed files
in cases like this).
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-12 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-11 20:00 [PATCH] early serial init John Tyner
2002-04-11 14:20 ` Armin
2002-04-11 21:26 ` John Tyner
2002-04-11 14:53 ` Armin
2002-04-11 22:36 ` andrew may
2002-04-11 16:05 ` Armin
2002-04-11 23:18 ` andrew may
2002-04-11 22:43 ` Matthew Locke
2002-04-11 22:52 ` John Tyner
2002-04-11 22:54 ` Matthew Locke
2002-04-11 23:10 ` Tom Rini
2002-04-11 23:28 ` andrew may
2002-04-12 0:03 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-04-12 0:41 ` andrew may
2002-04-11 23:09 ` Tom Rini
2002-04-12 1:29 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020412000341.GM759@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=acmay@acmay.homeip.net \
--cc=akuster@pacbell.net \
--cc=jtyner@cs.ucr.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.