All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: bill@billrees.com
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Large Partition Performance Test
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:39:37 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020412133937.A21820@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020411181459.69516.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.com>

Hello!

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:14:59AM -0700, Bill Rees wrote:
> I upgraded my kernel to 2.4.19-pre6 with the speedup
> patch installed and still see similiar results as
> before.  As the amount of data on the partition
> increases, my write performance slows.  This time, I
> simply modified a previously posted script to mimic my
> production application.  The test is still running and
> will take quite awhile to fill the disk.  Each line of
> the output represents 1.68gb of disk space.

Ok, I see the problem now. You create a lot of small files, and when a lot
of disk space is used, a lot of unnecesary blockfinding is performed on
each file creation.
if you mount your partition with -o no_unhashed_relocation option,
effect of that will be much lighter. With this option that's what I see:
day/hour 00 00 seconds = 285
day/hour 00 01 seconds = 288
day/hour 00 02 seconds = 290
day/hour 00 03 seconds = 289
day/hour 00 04 seconds = 290
day/hour 00 05 seconds = 292
day/hour 00 06 seconds = 292
day/hour 00 07 seconds = 292


Also new block allocator that I posted to the list recently should not excibit
this behavior at all in any of modes. (I am just going to verify this theory ;)
)

Bye,
    Oleg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-12  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-11 18:14 Large Partition Performance Test Bill Rees
2002-04-11 19:26 ` Hans Reiser
2002-04-11 19:43 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-04-11 20:28   ` Dirk Mueller
2002-04-11 22:11     ` Chris Mason
2002-04-12  9:41       ` Oleg Drokin
2002-04-12 13:21         ` Chris Mason
2002-04-12 13:32           ` Oleg Drokin
2002-04-11 19:48 ` Bill Rees
2002-04-12  9:39 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2002-04-12 13:21   ` Bill Rees
2002-04-12 13:29     ` Oleg Drokin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-11 19:28 Ivan Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020412133937.A21820@namesys.com \
    --to=green@namesys.com \
    --cc=bill@billrees.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.