From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:50:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:50:13 -0400 Received: from www.deepbluesolutions.co.uk ([212.18.232.186]:60687 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:50:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:50:06 +0100 From: Russell King To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.8: Preempt problems Message-ID: <20020417115006.E2386@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020417114331.D2386@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:43:31AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > Comments? Is there some fiddle in the x86 code somewhere that we've > missed in the ARM tree to get this to work? Appologies - just found the problem. We were missing the call to schedule_tail() after a fork. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html