From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Tappin Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: ALSA homepage redesign Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:43:22 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200204181843.22740.james@xena.uklinux.net> References: Reply-To: james@xena.uklinux.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thursday 18 April 2002 18:27, Fred Gleason wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > > NOOOO. could we please please please annihilate every last little > > trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ? > > I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x > thing is *hugely* confusing -- to me, to programmers, and to end users. > If 0.9.x is the stable API (it *is*, isn't it??), then let's all get > behind it and PUSH. In the same vein, let's get the docs for the > ancient 0.2.0 stuff off the site too. They just muddy the waters at > this point. Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into thinking that 0.5 is the "safer" option. Just a thought anyway. James -- James Tappin, O__ "I forget the punishment for using james@xena.uklinux.net -- \/` Microsoft --- Something lingering http://www.xena.uklinux.net/ with data loss in it I fancy"