All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank de Lange <lkml-frank@unternet.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:35:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020419193507.A17439@unternet.org> (raw)

Hi'all,

Anyone remember this thread:

   "severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access"

   http://hypermail.spyroid.com/linux-kernel/archived/2001/week52/0266.html

It describes the tendency of 2.4 series kernels to slowdown under I/O load.
Well, that problem still seems to be alive and kicking. And no, it is not
related to reiserfs as I previously suggested in this thread:

   "Abysmal interactive performance on 2.4.linus", archived here:

   http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0111.1/0911.html

I removed the last reiserfs partition quite some time ago, currently running
mostly ext3 with ext2 root fs.

The systems use IDE disks, I don't have any SCSI-systems handy to test whether
this might be IDE-only (anyone?). Currently running 2.4.18 (with preempt and
lowlatency, but the problems are NOT related to those patches as they also hit
unpatched kernels) on SMP (Abit BP-6 yeah yeah I know but it does not seem to
be specific to the BP-6).

Does anyone else see these problems? Specifically, does anyone with a
SCSI-based system see this happening? Also, does anyone who uses only ext2 (no
ext3 or reiserfs, let alone jfs/xfs or any other journaling fs) see this?

Cheers//Frank

 [ BTW: I'm moving to Sweden, and am looking for a project/job in Västra
   Götaland, preferrably Göteborg... Anyone know anything interesting? ]
-- 
  WWWWW      ________________________
 ## o o\    /     Frank de Lange     \
 }#   \|   /                          \
  \ `--| _/     <Hacker for Hire>      \
   `---'  \                            /
           \ lkml-frank@unternet.org  /
            `------------------------'
 [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
    et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est."  ]

             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-19 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-19 17:35 Frank de Lange [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-19 18:04 severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited) Frank de Lange
2002-04-19 23:07 Shane

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020419193507.A17439@unternet.org \
    --to=lkml-frank@unternet.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.