From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: r5 hash detected, unable to force r5 hash
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:44:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020422084450.A7155@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020421201341.GA9840@thebetteros.oche.de>
Hello!
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:13:41PM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
> >You hit the kernel error that was fixed already.
> Thank you for the info. Although super.c says:
> } else if (reiserfs_r5_hash(s) && code != R5_HASH) {
> printk("REISERFS: Error, r5 hash detected, "
> "unable to force r5 hash\n") ;
> code = UNSET_HASH ;
> }
There is separate patch, that was not included into 2.4.18 for whatever reason,
but was included into 2.4.19-pre3.
So you may try 2.4.19-pre3+ kernel, or patch you kernel with patches from
2.4.18.pending subdir on our ftp site. (this is mentioned on a web site, even)
> >Seriously, you run old kernel, went into problems, and instead of
> >upgrading to recommended kernel with recommended patches you just
> >wrote your original letter.
> Please take a look at the original mail. As soon as I ran into
> problems, I followed the advice on the home-page and upgraded to
> 2.4.18, it's near the bottom of my original mail. I also stated, that
Hm. So you went only half-through the instructions, then?
If latest kernel does not work for you, try applying all the pending patches.
> nothing changed, I did not run any buggy "official" kernel, but an
> Alan Cox one. I'm still very reluctant on running the official 2.4.18,
> since 2.4 linux has gone Windows :-/
That's your sole decision. 2.4.18 works great for me.
I even had 2.4.2 with 405 days of uptime until recently ;)
Bye,
Oleg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-22 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-19 18:57 r5 hash detected, unable to force r5 hash Frederick Page
2002-04-19 23:23 ` Arthur Erhardt
2002-04-19 23:59 ` Frederick Page
2002-04-20 0:40 ` Manuel Krause
2002-04-20 9:17 ` Arthur Erhardt
2002-04-20 11:03 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-04-20 19:00 ` Frederick Page
2002-04-21 9:48 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-04-21 20:13 ` Frederick Page
2002-04-22 4:44 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020422084450.A7155@namesys.com \
--to=green@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.