From: Frank Louwers <frank@openminds.be>
To: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: 2 NICs on same network
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:51:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020423155125.A9208@openminds.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020423113935.A30329@openminds.be> <20020423134549.GA2048@werewolf.able.es>
> Do you really need the two interfaces to be in the same subnet ? I use
> tw parallel nets for a cluster, but configured both as independent
> subnets, 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.1.0. So you can drive all nfs through one
> interface mounting the server as 10.0.0.1, and all the bproc traffic
> through the other (or all the ssh through the other connecting
> always to 10.0.1.1).
>
> Hope this helps.
Well, I was planning on using it as a backup link: use eth0 as my
"normal" interface card, with a traffic shaper on it, firewalled etc.
If however, something goes wrong with either the firewall, or traffic
shaper, or so, I have to drive 60 miles to my server to correct things
on the console.
I was hoping on configuring that second nic as a "backup" nic ...
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-23 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 9:39 BUG: 2 NICs on same network Frank Louwers
2002-04-23 10:53 ` rpm
2002-04-23 10:52 ` Frank Louwers
2002-04-23 11:12 ` rpm
[not found] ` <20020423124756.A3572@auto.ucl.ac.be>
[not found] ` <20020423115710.A31456@openminds.be>
[not found] ` <20020423134135.A7941@auto.ucl.ac.be>
2002-04-23 10:57 ` Frank Louwers
2002-04-23 13:10 ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-23 15:20 ` Vincent Guffens
2002-04-23 16:38 ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-23 20:54 ` Vincent Guffens
2002-04-23 19:19 ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-23 13:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-23 13:45 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-23 13:51 ` Frank Louwers [this message]
2002-04-23 13:58 ` Harley Stenzel
2002-04-23 16:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-23 11:11 ` Frank Louwers
2002-04-23 16:21 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-23 13:20 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-04-23 17:04 ` dean gaudet
2002-04-23 22:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-25 12:09 ` Roland Kuhn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-23 14:55 Dag Bakke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020423155125.A9208@openminds.be \
--to=frank@openminds.be \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.