From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:18:57 -0700 From: andrew may To: Armin Cc: andrew may , linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM ocp I2C Message-ID: <20020424081857.B17930@ecam.san.rr.com> References: <20020423200127.G20394@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020423200151.H20394@ecam.san.rr.com> <3CC63655.1080108@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3CC63655.1080108@pacbell.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:36:37PM -0700, Armin wrote: > andrew may wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 08:01:27PM -0700, andrew may wrote: > > > >>Would anyone be heartbroken if "struct i2c_algo_iic_data" went > >>away completely? > >> > >>In this patch I dump getown and getclock because they aren't > >>used and I am sure there is a better way to do things. > >> > >>Also calculate the I2C div value from the clock rate. I am > >>not sure if that will work on all 4xx types but it does the > >>right thing for my 405's. > >> > >>I also fixed a few C++ style comments. > >> > >> > > and the patch > > > > Andrew, > > > could you provide a single patch that would be applied on top of the > *devel. I appreciate the changes and I will get back to you in on > "struct i2c_algo_iic_data". I will need to try the div changes on the > redwoods (stb03 & stb04 cpus). This is a single patch, and you should be able to apply it without the other patches I sent. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/