From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:39:09 -0700 From: andrew may To: Matt Porter Cc: andrew may , linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver Message-ID: <20020424083909.C17930@ecam.san.rr.com> References: <20020422141601.B16319@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020423160548.A5009@home.com> <20020423182301.B19665@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020424144733.GA11949@beef.az.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020424144733.GA11949@beef.az.mvista.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:47:33AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: > It's not a good idea to merge the i2c-2.6.3 support into 2_4_devel. It seemed that Armins patch to the i2c list was against 2.6.3 so I deciede to merge that in before I merged in Armin's patch. I started doing the merge before you added in the files so that made things interesting. Unless you think 2.6.3 has some new bugs I see no reason to back out the changes in my tree. > The idea here is to make available a 4xx IIC driver that can be used > with the current i2c infrastructure in the 2.4 kernel and can be > changed in sync with any ocp changes that are made. I will try to make sure that my patches don't class with any of the core i2c stuff. My idea for posting the patches was just to show what I did in my tree, at this point we should be insync in terms of the actual ibm_ocp drivers. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/