All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: gh@us.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 09:38:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020503093856.A27263@rushmore> (raw)

> > > Rumor is that on some workloads MQ it outperforms O(1), but it
> > > may be that the latest (post K3?) O(1) is catching up?

Is MQ based on the Davide Libenzi scheduler? 
(a version of Davide's scheduler is in the -aa tree).

> > I'd be interested to know what workloads ?

> AIM on large CPU count machines was the most significant I had heard
> about.  Haven't measured recently on database load - we made a cut to
> O(1) some time back for simplicity.  Supposedly volanomark was doing
> better for a while but again we haven't cut back to MQ in quite a while;
> trying instead to refine O(1).  Volanomark is something of a scheduling
> anomaly though - sender/receiver timing on loopback affects scheduling
> decisions and overall throughput in ways that may or may not be consistent
> with real workloads.  AIM is probably a better workload for "real life"
> random scheduling testing.

tbench 192 is an anomaly test too.  AIM looks like a nice
"mixed" bench.  Do you have any scripts for it?  I'd like 
to use AIM too.

A side effect of O(1) in ac2 and jam6 on the 4 way box is a decrease 
in pipe bandwidth and an increase in pipe latency measured by lmbench:

kernel                    Pipe bandwidth in MB/s - bigger is better
-----------------------  ------
2.4.16                   383.93
2.4.19-pre3aa2           316.88
2.4.19-pre5              385.56
2.4.19-pre5-aa1          345.93
2.4.19-pre5-aa1-2g-hio   371.87
2.4.19-pre5-aa1-3g-hio   355.97
2.4.19-pre7              462.80
2.4.19-pre7-aa1          382.90
2.4.19-pre7-ac2           85.66
2.4.19-pre7-jam6          66.41
2.4.19-pre7-rl           464.60
2.4.19-pre7-rmap13       453.24

kernel                   Pipe latency in microseconds - smaller is better
-----------------------  -----
2.4.16                   12.73
2.4.19-pre3aa2           13.58
2.4.19-pre5              12.98
2.4.19-pre5-aa1          13.46
2.4.19-pre5-aa1-2g-hio   12.83
2.4.19-pre5-aa1-3g-hio   13.08
2.4.19-pre7              10.71
2.4.19-pre7-aa1          13.32
2.4.19-pre7-ac2          31.95
2.4.19-pre7-jam6         29.51
2.4.19-pre7-rl           10.71
2.4.19-pre7-rmap13       10.75

More at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html

-- 
Randy Hron


             reply	other threads:[~2002-05-03 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-03 13:38 rwhron [this message]
2002-05-03 20:29 ` O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192 Gerrit Huizenga
2002-05-04  8:13   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 22:13 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-07 22:44   ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 22:43     ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-07 23:39       ` Robert Love
2002-05-07 23:48         ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-08 15:34           ` Jussi Laako
2002-05-08 16:31             ` Robert Love
2002-05-08 17:02               ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-09  0:26                 ` Jussi Laako
2002-05-08  8:50   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-09 23:18     ` Mike Kravetz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-20 12:46 rwhron
2002-05-08 16:39 Bill Davidsen
2002-05-06  8:20 rwhron
2002-05-06 16:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-03 16:37 John Hawkes
2002-05-02 21:36 rwhron
2002-05-03  0:09 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-05-02 23:17   ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-03  0:14   ` Alan Cox
2002-05-03  1:08     ` Gerrit Huizenga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020503093856.A27263@rushmore \
    --to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.