From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314069AbSEFC3d>; Sun, 5 May 2002 22:29:33 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314072AbSEFC3c>; Sun, 5 May 2002 22:29:32 -0400
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:61325 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S314069AbSEFC30>;
	Sun, 5 May 2002 22:29:26 -0400
Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 19:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20020505.191805.71496104.davem@redhat.com>
To: mathieu@newview.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <xltd6wako2f.fsf@shookay.newview.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer <mathieu@newview.com>
   Date: 05 May 2002 22:27:52 -0400

   And what kind of traffic are you speaking of (I mean how much megs/teras
   per day)?
   
We're talking about several hundred kilo packet per second routing
over gigabit.