From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 21:08:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 21:08:20 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:7932 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 21:08:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 18:08:04 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Eyal Lebedinsky Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre8aa1 & vm-34: zftape-init.c compile error Message-ID: <20020505010804.GB2392@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Eyal Lebedinsky , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020503203738.E1396@dualathlon.random> <3CD328C5.2C6D389A@eyal.emu.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 10:18:13AM +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > Full patchkit: > > http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.19pre8aa1.gz > > linux-2.4-pre-aa/drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape-init.c fails to build, > a declaration is put in an illegal place. > Why is it illegal to put that before the ifdef instead of after? That's a litle strange looking diff output, what version is it? Which compiler gave the error?