From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@karaya.com>
Cc: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>,
Guest section DW <dwguest@win.tue.nl>,
Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: UML is now self-hosting!
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 09:21:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020505092133.L18594@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020505082505.GE2392@matchmail.com> <200205051225.HAA01629@ccure.karaya.com>
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:25:00AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> mfedyk@matchmail.com said:
> > How would this be better than MOSIX, or other clustering solutions?
>
> MOSIX (or Compaq's SSI) would certainly be a way of doing it. It happens
> that there's a particularly simple way of doing it with UML. You'd partition
> UML's 'physical' memory between the hosts, and use the fact that those pages
> are really virtual to fault them between hosts as needed. This would perform
> particularly badly, but its simplicity appeals to me.
See http://www.bitmover.com/cc-pitch/ for some more on this idea. I think
the UML approach would be very cool.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-05 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-03 21:08 UML is now self-hosting! Jeff Dike
2002-05-03 22:24 ` Jeff Dike
2002-05-03 21:51 ` Guest section DW
2002-05-03 22:28 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-05-04 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-04 17:12 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-05-04 1:32 ` Jeff Dike
2002-04-27 1:22 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-06 16:57 ` Jeff Dike
2002-05-05 8:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-05 8:29 ` Vikram
2002-05-05 8:42 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-05 12:25 ` Jeff Dike
2002-05-05 16:21 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-05-06 0:06 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2002-05-06 16:14 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-05-06 20:55 ` Jeff Dike
2002-05-07 16:26 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-05-07 13:29 ` Rob Landley
2002-05-07 19:35 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020505092133.L18594@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=dwguest@win.tue.nl \
--cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jdike@karaya.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.