From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315989AbSEGVzy>; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:55:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315988AbSEGVzx>; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:55:53 -0400
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:38561 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S315884AbSEGVzv>;
	Tue, 7 May 2002 17:55:51 -0400
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 14:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20020507.144408.01520509.davem@redhat.com>
To: thunder@ngforever.de
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205071548290.15559-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
   Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:52:59 -0600 (MDT)

   On Tue, 7 May 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
   > I have the correct fixes for sparc64 in my tree and I'll merge it
   > all to Linus.
   
   That's good. Where do I find a patch, or is it already merged?

Not merged, still testing and tweaking.  It will be merged
after I am done with that.