From: john slee <indigoid@higherplane.net>
To: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Cc: John Stoffel <stoffel@casc.com>,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>,
Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
khttpd-users@alt.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:28:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020509112837.GC3855@higherplane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15574.52864.321544.44124@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205062251100.8163-100000@fogarty.jakma.org>
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:52:48PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, John Stoffel wrote:
>
> > And why does a Web server belong in the kernel? I've never understood
> > this, and I personally do not think it has any need to be there.
>
> <humour>
>
> it's all part of a fiendish plot, principal conspirator in which is
> Jeff Merkey, to turn linux into the new Netware...
this i find genuinely amusing. jeff would probably disagree though as
he's apparently been doing anything but netware stuff lately. in fact
ive hardly seen him mention the N-word at all in the past few months on
this list
j.
--
R N G G "Well, there it goes again... And we just sit
I G G G here without opposable thumbs." -- gary larson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-09 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-06 0:28 khttpd rotten? Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 2:14 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-06 2:39 ` Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 10:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-06 11:28 ` [PATCH] " Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 17:23 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-09 9:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 10:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-09 13:04 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-11 0:13 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-05-06 14:17 ` Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-06 16:08 ` Andy Carlson
2002-05-06 23:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-05-07 14:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 15:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 15:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 15:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 16:02 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-06 17:21 ` Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 18:42 ` John Stoffel
2002-05-06 19:07 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-06 19:18 ` Cort Dougan
2002-05-06 20:47 ` Michael Rothwell
2002-05-09 11:20 ` Appications in kernelspace (was:Tux in main kernel tree?) Anders Peter Fugmann
2002-05-06 21:52 ` Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Paul Jakma
2002-05-09 11:28 ` john slee [this message]
2002-05-07 3:00 ` J Sloan
2002-05-09 11:40 ` khttpd rotten? john slee
2002-05-09 11:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-09 19:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 19:39 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-10 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-10 10:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 20:12 ` Ian Molton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020509112837.GC3855@higherplane.net \
--to=indigoid@higherplane.net \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=khttpd-users@alt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@clubi.ie \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=stoffel@casc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.