From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 19:11:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020511191118.F1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CDD5570.E7E97205@mvista.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205111034400.2355-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:37:39AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2002, george anzinger wrote:
> >
> > So, what to do? For ARM and MIPS we could go back to solution 1:
>
> Why not just put that knowledge in the ARM/MIPS architecture makefile?
>
> ARM already has multiple linker scripts, and it already selects on them
> based on CONFIG options, so I'd much rather just do that straightforward
> kind of thing than play any clever games.
So would I - there will be a config option, so we can just use sed on the
relevant linker script to do the right thing.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-11 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-22 15:12 How should we do a 64-bit jiffies? george anzinger
2001-10-23 5:10 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23 6:05 ` Brian Gerst
2001-10-23 6:23 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23 8:03 ` george anzinger
2001-10-23 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-26 20:59 ` george anzinger
[not found] ` <200110231545.f9NFjgg01377@penguin.transmeta.com>
2002-05-10 21:35 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution george anzinger
2002-05-10 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-10 22:36 ` george anzinger
2002-05-10 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 0:42 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 george anzinger
2002-05-11 8:29 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 15:01 ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:10 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 17:31 ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 18:11 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-05-11 23:38 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12 0:01 ` Russell King
2002-05-12 0:31 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12 8:12 ` george anzinger
[not found] ` <3CDD6DA1.7B259EF1@mvista.com>
[not found] ` <20020511201748.G1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2002-05-12 8:03 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 (Fix ARM) george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:41 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-13 11:09 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020511191118.F1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.