From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
To: Rudmer van Dijk <rudmer@legolas.dynup.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, andre@linux-ide.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.14-dj2
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 21:36:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020511213630.A30904@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.1.20020511114723.009c8270@pop.cablewanadoo.nl> <20020508225147.GA11390@suse.de> <4.1.20020511114723.009c8270@pop.cablewanadoo.nl> <20020511191406.S5262@suse.de> <4.1.20020511205025.009703a0@pop.cablewanadoo.nl>
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 09:04:20PM +0200, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> >http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@1.513.1.14?nav=index.html
> and still the patch I included applied to 2.5.14-dj2...
*boggle* $deity knows how.
I just checked. From a clean 2.4.14, with -dj2 patch applied, that
segment of code reads..
#if SUPPORT_SLOW_DATA_PORTS
if (drive->channel->slow)
ata_write_slow(drive, buffer, wcount);
else
#endif
ata_write_16(drive, buffer, wcount);
}
So this part..
> > > - ata_write_16(drive, buffer, wcount<<1);
> > > + ata_write_16(drive, buffer, wcount);
Should reject (or at least say already applied)
It may be patch(1) being funky, and doing something silly like adding the
same patch twice (something thats bitten me a few times, and has also happened
in Linus' tree once or twice).
Dave.
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-11 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-08 22:51 Linux 2.5.14-dj2 Dave Jones
2002-05-09 9:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-05-09 14:33 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-11 14:46 ` Rudmer van Dijk
2002-05-11 15:00 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-11 17:14 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-11 19:04 ` Rudmer van Dijk
2002-05-11 19:36 ` Dave Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020511213630.A30904@suse.de \
--to=davej@suse.de \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rudmer@legolas.dynup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.