From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: corrupted fs: bitmap does not match to the correct one.... Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 17:08:55 +0400 Message-ID: <20020515170855.A986@namesys.com> References: <3066.1021467577@www49.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3066.1021467577@www49.gmx.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: grobe@gmx.net Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:59:37PM +0200, grobe@gmx.net wrote: > I have a bad problem with my reiserfs. I got a lot of SCSI-errors in the Hm. SCSI errors are bad, and you have performed everything on the same hardware? What kind of errors was there, by the way? > logs, and did a reiserfsck --rebuild-tree. Than, I checked the (hopefuly) fixed > fs, and now I get errors: What version of reiserfsprogs was used? > [...] > node (9614688) with wrong level (1) found in the tree (should be 3) > [...a lot of this] > free block count 70151604 mismatches with a correct one 70141253 > on-disk bitmap des not match to the correct one. 8134442 bytes differ > If I try to mount the fs, mount tells me "no directory"... How about more error messages about scsi errors in the logs? > I have resized the fs in the past, some months ago... is it possible that > these errors result from a bad resize action? The fs was up for quite a long Not likely. If you have extended the fs more than 132M in size, you'd notice if something go wrong instantly. > just would like to know if there is a chance to restore the fs, or should I > just take the backup and build a new fs? There is always a chance, another question (rather important in your case, it seems) is what option would be faster. Bye, Oleg