From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: corrupted fs: bitmap does not match to the correct one.... Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 18:06:09 +0400 Message-ID: <20020515180609.A2073@namesys.com> References: <20020515170855.A986@namesys.com> <19890.1021471126@www22.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19890.1021471126@www22.gmx.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: grobe@gmx.net Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:58:46PM +0200, grobe@gmx.net wrote: > > > I have a bad problem with my reiserfs. I got a lot of SCSI-errors in the > > > Hm. SCSI errors are bad, and you have performed everything on the same > > hardware? > Yes, a Serveraid 4M with a EXP15 Raid 5 attached. Curent kernel (2.4.16), > current firmware, current driver (and UNCHANGED!). > > What kind of errors was there, by the way? > May 15 12:54:01 Zeus kernel: I/O error: dev 08:11, sector 211045693 > [... a lot of these ...] Ah, failing hardware. Unfortunatelly we only deal with failing harddrive based on http://namesys.com/support.html terms. > > What version of reiserfsprogs was used? > 3.x.0j That's way too old. > > How about more error messages about scsi errors in the logs? > As I mentioned, I can't mount any more, so no more messages... Hm. So you read corrupted on-disk infortmation with reiserfsck, then wrote it back. That'd going to hurt for sure. > > There is always a chance, another question (rather important in your case, > > it seems) is what option would be faster. > That's what I need to know ;-) In fact, the backup is on an IDE-Array, I > dont get more than 10MB/s from the backup server, and i have 300GB of data... I'd say you'd better stay using your backups (on a different hard drive(s)). Also you probably want to ask whoever sold you the failing harddrive to replace it. Bye, Oleg