All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nathan Scott <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Quota patches
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 15:07:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020520150757.A16965@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020520135530.GB9209@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:55:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> quota-2.5.15-3-register - this patch implements registering/unregistering of quota
>   formats

Please don't use the big kernel lock for a newly added list.
Also using <linux/lists.h> would clean up the list handling.

> quota-2.5.15-4-getstats - this patch removes Q_GETSTATS call and creates /proc/fs/quota
>   entry instead

Yuck, even more /proc abuse.  Please convert it to the seq_file interface
at least. Using individual sysctls per value would be much better.

> quota-2.5.15-7-quotactl - implementation of generic quotactl interface (probably the
>   biggest patch). Interface is moved from dquot.c to quota.c file. Pointers
>   to quota operations in superblock are now not filled on quota_on() but
>   on mount so filesystem can override them (for example ext3 would like to
>   check on quota_on() that quotafile lies on proper device and turn on
>   data-journaling on it - at least when we'll have journaled quota :)).

The vfs_get*/vfs_set* names sound too generic, could you please rename them
to vfs_get_quota*/vfs_set_quota*?

Also I think any quota supporting filesystem should set the quota operations
explicitly to make the intention clearer.

> quota-2.5.15-12-compat - implements backward compatible quotactl() interface. It's
>   configurable whether it should be used at all and whether is should behave
>   as interface in Linus's (the oldest interface) or Alan's (old interface for
>   new quota format) kernel.

I don't think we want to keep old userspace interface in 2.5, it just
bloats the kernel and requiring quota tools for a development kernel that
are already required by all vendor kernels sounds sane to me.

Else your patches look very good to me, I look forward to finally see
properly working quota support in a mainline kernel.

	Christoph


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-20 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-20 13:55 Quota patches Jan Kara
2002-05-20 14:07 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2002-05-20 15:38   ` Jan Kara
2002-05-22 19:46 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-05-22 19:57   ` Jan Kara
2002-05-22 23:30   ` Nathan Scott
2002-05-23  0:59     ` Nathan Scott
2002-05-23  1:56       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-23  1:55         ` Nathan Scott
2002-05-23  9:16         ` Jan Kara
2002-05-23 17:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-24  2:35             ` Nathan Scott
2002-05-24  3:46               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-24 14:58               ` Jan Kara
2002-05-24 14:10                 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-24 15:43                   ` Alan Cox
2002-05-24 14:31                     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-24 15:43                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-24 14:43                         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-24 16:12                           ` Alan Cox
2002-05-24 15:55                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-24 14:54                               ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-24 16:18                               ` Alan Cox
2002-05-24 16:14                       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-24 16:01                         ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-24 18:41                         ` Thunder from the hill
2002-05-24 15:07             ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <20020523154249.X180298@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
2002-05-23  8:53 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020520150757.A16965@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.