From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: journal log file
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:45:25 +0400
Message-ID: <20020520184525.A2587@namesys.com>
References: <200205201602.21334.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-10391-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200205201602.21334.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Dieter N?tzel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Hello!

On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 04:02:21PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > For a filesystem with 4k blocksize standard journal is always 32M (and
> > variable blocksize or relocated journal patches won't be produced for 2.2
> > kernels anyway).
> Oleg, you should have mentioned that Chris had a "variable" log size patch for 
> "ages" but he only haven't had enough time for polishing it.

Not for 2.2 kernel.
And the question was about 2.2

> I for myself were very excited when we get this in some day 'cause than I have 
> some little more space on my "boot" partition left or I can shrink it 
> finally.

You seems to be brave enough to use 2.5 kernels, it seems ;)

Bye,
    Oleg