From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 18:25:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 18:25:07 -0400 Received: from pc-62-31-74-121-ed.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.31.74.121]:14981 "EHLO sisko.scot.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 18:25:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 23:25:04 +0100 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Herman Oosthuysen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: 2.2 kernel - Ext3 & Raid patches Message-ID: <20020523232504.A1664@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3CEA7866.23557.390B7FFC@localhost> <20020523011144.GA4006@matchmail.com> <20020523094948.A2462@redhat.com> <001701c20269$67d48dc0$0100007f@localdomain.wni.com.wirelessnetworksinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:52:04AM -0600, Herman Oosthuysen wrote: > Does this mean that Ext3 is still not recommended for use with RAID1? On 2.2, yes. On 2.4, it should work just fine: the 2.4 raid layer is much better behaved, and does not try to perform resync via the buffer cache. Cheers, Stephen