From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: EVMS Reiser FSIM
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:50:19 +1000
Message-ID: <20020531095019.A30095@gnu.org>
References: <OF7550755B.8F3C611F-ON85256BC8.0056E5DC@pok.ibm.com> <20020530095323.GA1076@gnu.org> <3CF62181.1000802@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-10459-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3CF62181.1000802@namesys.com>; from reiser@namesys.com on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:56:33PM +0400
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Steve Pratt <slpratt@us.ibm.com>, Yury Umanets <umka@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:56:33PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:28:38AM -0500, Steve Pratt wrote:
> >>I want to use the code approved by the owners of the file system.
> >
> >Me too.  Just the ext2 maintainer doesn't like this approach, so
> >I'm going to need to push a bit harder (and I don't have time now)
>
> I can imagine why he doesn't want to depend on the ext2 guys to find 
> time for reading his code, and you should not assume he is without good 
> reasons on this.

Oh absolutely, and I agree 100%.  (That was what I was saying!)

> I have watched people try to get code into ext2.....

Yeah, Ted is rather conservative.  But, it's good, because it forces
you to be minimalist :)

Andrew