From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: [PATCH CFT] tons of logging patches Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:43:32 +0400 Message-ID: <20020605124332.A17867@namesys.com> References: <1023076301.22608.1778.camel@tiny> <3CFC1CB5.8040102@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <1023159462.31682.54.camel@tiny> <3CFC3F0B.6060707@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <1023197656.31475.101.camel@tiny> <3CFD2F32.7070701@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CFD2F32.7070701@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Chris Mason , Manuel Krause , reiserfs-list Hello! On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:20:50AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > >BTW, for general usage, the most important speedup in these patches is > >the commit_super patch. The namesys guys already have that in the queue > >of stuff to send for 2.4.20-pre. > You will see substantial performance increases in 2.4.20 > Oleg is doing a complete rewrite of our write function, and is seeing > large file performance increases of 25%. Note that I see only 25+% performance increase CPU-wise. Since the task is io-bound real time does not change much (unless one runs tests on the ramdisk or similar (by speed) kind of storage). Bye, Oleg