From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Austermuehle Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature? Message-ID: <20020607121530.C5571@babbage.hcsd.de> References: <20020607112710.A5563@babbage.hcsd.de> <20020607093300.GA2085@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> <20020607113705.A5571@babbage.hcsd.de> <20020607094430.GA2148@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> <20020607115623.B5571@babbage.hcsd.de> <20020607100706.GA2222@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> <20020607101052.GD1053@tykepenguin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020607101052.GD1053@tykepenguin.com>; from caulfield@sistina.com on Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:10:52AM +0100 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Jun 7 05:16:02 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:10:52AM +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote: > I think he means the VFS lock patch in 1.1rc2 - which should be > fine. It might be a stack size issue ? I took only the VFS lock patch from 1.1rc2, everything else is from 1.0.4. Stephan