All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, rml@tech9.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:54:53 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020612.145453.95533845.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206121551190.10732-100000@elte.hu>

   From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
   Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:57:34 +0200 (CEST)

   here is a solution that allows us to eat and have the pudding at once.  
   (patch attached, against Linus' latest BK tree):
   
Thanks for doing this, it looks fine to me.  Also, thanks for being so
thorough in your testing.  If only everyone would do this :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-12 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-06 23:20 Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed) Mike Kravetz
2002-06-07 18:36 ` Robert Love
2002-06-07 19:12   ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 20:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-10 20:57       ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 22:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-10 23:15           ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 23:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-10 23:28               ` Robert Love
2002-06-11  0:05                 ` [patch] current scheduler bits, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-11  0:27                   ` Robert Love
2002-06-11 17:35                     ` [patch] current scheduler bits #2, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-11 18:25                       ` Robert Love
2002-06-11 18:33                         ` [patch] current scheduler bits #3, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-13 21:26                           ` [PATCH] " Robert Love
2002-06-13 22:06                             ` [patch] current scheduler bits #4, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-07 23:20   ` Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed) J.A. Magallon
2002-06-12  0:00     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-06-10 18:50   ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 20:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-12 11:54       ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 16:57         ` [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock Ingo Molnar
2002-06-12 21:54           ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-06-12 22:31           ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020612.145453.95533845.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.