From: Nick Drage <nickd@funkyjesus.org>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility?
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 00:17:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020616001745.N2090@funkyjesus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206152233.g5FMXPA27757@Networker.rockstone.co.uk>; from Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk on Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:33:23PM +0100
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:33:23PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Saturday 15 June 2002 11:14 pm, Brian Capouch wrote:
> > I wonder if the sages on this list might share advice as to whether or
> > not it might be practical to maintain a working ISP where ALL client
> > machines use private IP addresses, which are then NAT-ted to public IP
> > space as necessary by iptables.
> >
> > The biggest drawback that has been voiced so far is that many
> > peer-to-peer apps would break, but I'm not so sure right now that is bad
> > thing.
>
> Some current ISPs already do this, and I guess the popularity with their
> customers varies according to what the customers want to do :-)
Can you name any ISPs that do this? I haven't seen it in my limited
experience.
<snip>
--
FunkyJesus System Administration Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-15 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-15 22:14 Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility? Brian Capouch
2002-06-15 22:33 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-15 22:54 ` Brian Capouch
2002-06-15 23:17 ` Nick Drage [this message]
2002-06-15 23:30 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-17 4:25 ` Sathi
2002-06-17 10:58 ` nat problem umar
2002-06-17 15:46 ` (no subject) skmail
2002-06-17 18:11 ` nat problem Antony Stone
2002-06-18 17:16 ` Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility? Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-18 18:50 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-18 20:22 ` Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-18 22:50 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-19 14:36 ` Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-19 15:20 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-20 9:48 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-20 19:37 ` Rodrigo Senra
2002-06-21 0:19 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-06-24 18:42 ` Rodrigo Senra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-15 23:47 hard__ware
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020616001745.N2090@funkyjesus.org \
--to=nickd@funkyjesus.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.