From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Schaaf Subject: Re: MSN Messenger ALG Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:49:14 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <20020627194913.A2890@oknodo.bof.de> References: <20020627112623.GD9003@naboo.rchrd.phub.net.cable.rogers.com> <000001c21dfc$3d236890$7200a8c0@blue> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: 'Amir Khandani' , netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org Return-path: To: Glover George Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c21dfc$3d236890$7200a8c0@blue>; from dime@gulfsales.com on Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:01:05PM -0500 Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:01:05PM -0500, Glover George wrote: > Yes, SIP can get very hairy, because it's primarily xml -ished based. SIP is very similar to HTTP, and thus any special protocol action would best be handled by the traditional application level gateway. The REDIRECT target can be used to transparently address that gateway. There's no need for any new magic within iptables, I think. best regards Patrick