From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2.5.22] simple ide-tape.c and ide-floppy.c cleanup
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020703155113.GA26299@zombie.inka.de> (raw)
Why not another way round? Just make the ide-scsi driver be prefered,
and hack ide-scsi a bit to simulate the cdrom and adv.floppy devices
that are expected as /dev/hd* by some user's configuration?
To be honest - why keep ide-[cd,floppy,tape] when they can be almost
completely replaced with ide-scsi? I know about only few cdrom devices
that are broken (== not ATAPI compliant) but can be used with
workarounds in the current ide-cd driver. OTOH many users do already
need ide-scsi to access cd recorders and similar hardware, so they would
benefit much more from having ide-scsi as default than few users of
broken "atapi" drives.
Other operating systems did switch to constitent (scsi-based) way of
accessing all kinds of removable media drivers. Why does Linux have to
keep a kludge, written years ago without having a good concept?
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
Ich glaube nicht, daß man dieses Stück in Software umgesetzte Scheiße über-
haupt mieser machen kann, als es sowieso schon ist. Das dürfte das einzige
Programm sein, das vom Verhalten und seinen Anwendern her schlimmer als XP
auf einem Amiga ist. - Manuel Richardt in ka.talk ueber Outlook Express
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-03 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-03 15:51 Eduard Bloch [this message]
2002-07-03 18:03 ` [PATCH 2.5.22] simple ide-tape.c and ide-floppy.c cleanup Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-08 4:23 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-07-08 20:33 ` Paul Bristow
2002-07-08 21:41 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-07-08 21:56 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-09 12:28 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-07-09 12:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-03 22:21 James Bottomley
[not found] <mailman.1025711581.26152.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-07-03 20:18 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-03 22:09 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-06-19 21:45 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-20 5:42 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-20 9:16 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-20 9:22 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 16:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-20 16:41 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 16:44 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-20 16:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-20 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020703155113.GA26299@zombie.inka.de \
--to=edi@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.