On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:54:04AM +1000, George Vieira wrote: > So why are you allowing any other device being allowed, please tell me your > not running PPPoE for adsl or something.. this means your network is open > then..... No I am not using PPPoE. I have a plain normal ethernet connection with an static IP. What would you use instead of '! eth0' ? NOTE: I know that my network is not open. It's very easy to verify, starting with pinging myself from outside. Christophe > > thanks, > George Vieira > Systems Manager > Citadel Computer Systems P/L > http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: christophe barbé [mailto:christophe.barbe.ml@online.fr] > Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 9:47 AM > To: netfilter@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: simple rules and unexpected traffic > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:44:36AM +1000, George Vieira wrote: > > Have you got any packet counts for the DROPped rules?? > > no. > > > I'm still a bit stumped on the > > > > -A block -i ! eth0 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT > > > > as what other devices do you have??? > > I have only eth0 and lo. > > Christophe > > > > > > thanks, > > George Vieira > > Systems Manager > > Citadel Computer Systems P/L > > http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: christophe barbé [mailto:christophe.barbe.ml@online.fr] > > Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 8:57 AM > > To: netfilter@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: simple rules and unexpected traffic > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:54:36AM +0200, Jan Humme wrote: > > > On Friday 05 July 2002 00:45, christophe barbé wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 08:35:53AM +1000, George Vieira wrote: > > > > > Yes I've found that some user space programs can see stuff before > > > > > iptables.. tcpdump too I think... > > > > > > > > Yes it sounds logical for tcpdump or tools like that (which pass the > > > > interface in promiscuisious mode) to see everything. I was not > expecting > > > > the same from a unprivileged app like gkrellm. > > > > It is stil unclear for me what is the data processing path. > > > > > > > > Has someone a clear picture of the packets path ? > > > > > > It is no problem to open a socket and receive a copy of all raw packets > > > before they get to the kernel iptables modules. See "man 7 packet" for > > > details. > > > > > > I believe this is how tcpdump does it too. > > > > Ok it sounds logical. > > Now the question is what is dropping these packets ? Apparently not > > rp_filter, and not netfilter because I see no log for it. > > > > Christophe > > > > > > > > Jan Humme. > > > > -- > > Christophe Barbé > > GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E > > > > Imagination is more important than knowledge. > > Albert Einstein, On Science > > -- > Christophe Barbé > GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E > > L'experience, c'est une connerie par jour mais jamais la même. > -- Christophe Barbé GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E Dogs believe they are human. Cats believe they are God.