From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
Linux-Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OKS] Kernel release management
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:45:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020706124534.GA476@think.thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020704131654.B11601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:16:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:19:41PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Look at the pressure to get stuff into 2.4 when it's already in 2.5. Because
> > 2.4 is what people are actually using, and 2.5 is really just for os
> > development and testing (and general playing with) at this point.
>
> If stuff in 2.5 wasn't soo broken (looking at IDE here) then more people
> would be using it, and less people would be wanting the 2.5 features back
> ported to 2.4. IMHO, at the moment 2.5 has a major problem. It is not
> getting the testing it deserves because things like IDE and such like
> aren't reasonably stable enough.
And the obvious answer to this is a backport of the 2.4 IDE subsystem
to 2.5..... CONFIG_IDE_WONT_FIND_NEW_E2FSCK_BUGS, anyone? :-)
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-07 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-01 18:25 [OKS] Kernel release management Bill Davidsen
2002-07-01 18:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-01 19:24 ` Justin M. Forbes
2002-07-02 15:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-03 1:19 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-03 11:10 ` Matt Bernstein
2002-07-04 12:16 ` Russell King
2002-07-06 12:45 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2002-07-07 19:37 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-07-04 12:02 ` Russell King
2002-07-04 13:33 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04 14:32 ` Russell King
2002-07-03 15:34 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-03 14:24 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-04 2:18 ` jw schultz
2002-07-04 12:21 ` Russell King
2002-07-06 12:17 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-04 3:44 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020702110848.27954D-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <200207030718.g637I0L145202@pimout2-int.prodigy.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020704131654.B11601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-07-04 13:35 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020706124534.GA476@think.thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=landley@trommello.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.