From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Schaaf Subject: Re: cttest-0.3 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:10:07 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <20020707181007.O13116@oknodo.bof.de> References: <20020707151703.M13116@oknodo.bof.de> <1026054628.1283.170.camel@tux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Patrick Schaaf , Netfilter-devel Return-path: To: Martin Josefsson Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1026054628.1283.170.camel@tux>; from gandalf@wlug.westbo.se on Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 05:10:28PM +0200 Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Now also see: http://bei.bof.de/ex3 http://bei.bof.de/ex3rt http://bei.bof.de/ex3abcd http://bei.bof.de/ex3crc This is the same calculations as before, but with a different data set. These are from a web server farm (a web portal), with the server farm running on a single virtual IP address [*]. I have accumulated the /proc/net/ip_conntracks from all servers in the farm. There are 37608 unique conntrack entries, and all but 2385 of them refer to the virtual service IP and port 80. This dataset is to show the extreme case of a single-address-and-port server. best regards Patrick [*] we use Cisco IOS SLB for loadbalancing