From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andras Kis-Szabo Subject: Re: [CRAP] Some patches Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:31:06 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <20020708093106.B13285@sch.bme.hu> References: <20020616200239.GI23720@stingr.net> <20020705140810.GI21280@naboo.ists.dartmouth.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020705140810.GI21280@naboo.ists.dartmouth.edu> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte ........................................ (2002. július 05.) Hi! > > But ipv6 stuff seems awful :( it just duplicating one function already > > present in ipv6 code :( and doing it without static keyword ... > I think kisza has dealt with this.. There are 5(6?) independent patches. I started a thread at the netdev about this problem. The result was: the firewall should be independent drom the network code... (We can not trust in the network code.) (The two function wasn't the same...) BTW: the function will be included in 2.4.19, with the export. After this the p-o-m will be changed (and wil depend on the 2.4.19-patch). regards, kisza -- Andras Kis-Szabo Security Development, Design and Audit -------------------------/ Zorp, NetFilter and IPv6 kisza@SecurityAudit.hu /-----Member of the BUTE-MIS-SEARCHlab---------->