From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Ville Herva <vherva@niksula.hut.fi>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:20:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710142005.U762@host110.fsmlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1026331418.1244.82.camel@sinai>; from rml@tech9.net on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:03:38PM -0700
Why was the rate incremented to maintain interactive performance? Wasn't
that the whole idea of the pre-empt work? Does the burden of pre-empt
actually require this?
It seems that the added inefficiency of these extra interrupts is going to
drag performance down.
} George Anzinger's 64-bit jiffies are in 2.5.
}
} Tim's code to better utilize them is in 2.5 I _think_.
}
} > Didn't Red Hat change HZ to 1000 (or 1024) in Limbo as well? How did they
} > handle that?
}
} Yes, RedHat's current devel kernel is using HZ=1000. I am not sure how
} they handled it. What we have in 2.5 now is correct.
}
} Robert Love
}
} -
} To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
} the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
} More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
} Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-10 5:11 [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002 Guillaume Boissiere
2002-07-10 15:49 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-10 16:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-10 16:31 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-10 16:51 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-10 17:00 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-10 16:54 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-07-10 17:25 ` John Levon
2002-07-10 19:19 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-07-10 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-10 20:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-10 17:12 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-07-10 17:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-10 17:54 ` Robert Love
2002-07-10 19:18 ` Ville Herva
2002-07-10 20:03 ` Robert Love
2002-07-10 20:20 ` Cort Dougan [this message]
2002-07-10 20:25 ` Robert Love
2002-07-10 20:41 ` Ville Herva
2002-07-10 21:07 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-10 20:46 ` Robert Love
2002-07-11 9:46 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-07-10 20:26 ` Justin M. Forbes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-10 17:46 Perches, Joe
2002-07-10 18:05 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-10 18:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-10 18:49 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-07-10 19:19 ` Larry Kessler
2002-07-10 21:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-11 18:07 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-07-10 21:27 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-10 18:08 Russ Weight
2002-07-11 19:21 Richard J Moore
2002-07-11 20:34 Richard J Moore
2002-07-13 9:28 ` Ingo Oeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020710142005.U762@host110.fsmlabs.com \
--to=cort@fsmlabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=vherva@niksula.hut.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.