From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: reiserfsprogs release
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:46:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20020710154630.A8901@infradead.org>
References: <200206251829.25799.vitaly@namesys.com> <20020625165254.GA30301@matrix.wg> <200206261317.10813.vitaly@namesys.com> <200207101206.48370.vitaly@namesys.com> <1026311034.7074.76.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20020710153801.A8570@infradead.org> <1026312272.5663.227.camel@tiny>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-10952-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1026312272.5663.227.camel@tiny>; from mason@suse.com on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:44:32AM -0400
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>, Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

> No, it does not require that version.  It is a good idea since fsck
> improves with each release though ;-)

the list in Documentation/Changes is what's needed _at least_.  It doesn't
make much sense to upgrade it all the time.