All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de>,
	Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>,
	dank@kegel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	cmolsen@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Periodic clock tick considered harmful (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small  as possible)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:05:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020711180753.CC97D3FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200207111745.g6BHjmT64928@d12relay01.de.ibm.com>

On Thursday 11 July 2002 03:45 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Thunder from the hill wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 dank@kegel.com wrote:
> >> OK, so I'm just an ignorant member of the peanut gallery, but
> >> I'd like to hear a real kernel hacker explain why this isn't
> >> the way to go.
> >
> > The only thing that was mentioned yet was the amount of stuff that
> > depends on periodic ticks. If we just tick unperiodically, we'd fail for
> > sure, but if we make these instances depend on another timer - we won.
> >
> > I think a good scheduler can handle this and should also be able to
> > determine a halfaway optimal tick rate for the current load.
>
> The current approach on s390 is stop the timer tick only for idle cpus,
> because that's where it hurts. A busy system can just keep on using 100
> (or 1000) Hz timers.
> The jiffies value then gets updated from the time stamp counter when an
> interrupt happens on an idle CPU.
>
> See Martin Schwidefsky's recent post for code:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102578746520177&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102578746420174&w=2
>
>         Arnd <><
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


There has also been some work done by Michael Olsen (cmolsen@us.ibm.com)
regarding noperiodic jiffie updates. This was in the context of embedded 
handheld devices, in particular IBM's LinuxWatch. Similar problem
arise in such devices where the timer tick can be a significant source of 
battery drainage.
There are/were some settled differences between Michael and Martin approach, 
which I won't be able to adequately describe. 
I believe Michael has a publication on this, I let him respond.

-- 
-- Hubertus Franke  (frankeh@watson.ibm.com)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-11 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-11 16:44 Periodic clock tick considered harmful (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible) dank
2002-07-11 16:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-11 19:45   ` Arnd Bergmann
2002-07-11 17:05     ` Hubertus Franke [this message]
2002-07-11 19:06 ` george anzinger
2002-07-11 19:19   ` mbs
2002-07-11 20:25     ` george anzinger
2002-07-11 21:29       ` Periodic clock tick considered harmful (was: Re: HZ, preferably as Alan Cox
2002-07-11 21:43         ` george anzinger
2002-07-11 22:32       ` Periodic clock tick considered harmful (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible) Karim Yaghmour
2002-07-15  5:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-15  5:43   ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-11 21:28 Per Jessen
2002-07-16  9:10 Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020711180753.CC97D3FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de \
    --cc=cmolsen@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=thunder@ngforever.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.