All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Lincoln Dale <ltd@cisco.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2 performance in 2.5.25 versus 2.4.19pre8aa2
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:30:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020715123011.B2487@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020714202539.022c4270@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com>; from ltd@cisco.com on Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +1000

On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
> one-line summary is that some results are better, some are worse; CPU usage 
> is better in 2.5.25, but thoughput is sometimes
> worse.

You might want to rerun your tests on 2.5.25 after redefining HZ to be 100, 
or setting HZ to 1000 in the 2.4 kernel.

		-ben

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-15 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-08  3:19 direct-to-BIO for O_DIRECT Andrew Morton
2002-07-08  3:30 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-07-08  7:44 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-07-11  2:25 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-07-11  3:24   ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11  3:25     ` Lincoln Dale
     [not found]       ` <3D2CFF48.9EFF9C59@zip.com.au>
2002-07-14 12:22         ` ext2 performance in 2.5.25 versus 2.4.19pre8aa2 Lincoln Dale
2002-07-15  5:30           ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-15  6:06             ` Lincoln Dale
2002-07-15  6:52               ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-15  9:49               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-15 10:16                 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-07-15 18:08                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-17 19:22             ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-15 16:30           ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2002-07-11 19:52   ` direct-to-BIO for O_DIRECT Jesse Barnes
2002-07-11 23:40     ` Lincoln Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020715123011.B2487@redhat.com \
    --to=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    --cc=ltd@cisco.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.