From: glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:17:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020720041700.GA8172@butterfly.hjsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207192119380.28216-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2144 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:20:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (02/07/17 1.630)
> [PATCH] The real netfilter conntrack SMP overrun fix
assuming this should have fixed this:
LIST_DELETE: ip_conntrack_core.c:165
`&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY]'(dd8f2e90) not in &ip_conntrack_hash
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)].
it doesn't seem to have taken. i see this error and the following
crash when i use these rules:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 64.192.31.41
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.1
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 127.0.0.1
when i use the masquerading instead of snat, it doesn't exhibit the
error and crash.
here's the info for my _stable_ config on my dual athlon 1800+:
---
If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version.
Compare to the current minimal requirements in Documentation/Changes.
Linux butterfly 2.4.19-rc3 #1 SMP Fri Jul 19 21:30:52 EDT 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Gnu C gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 20020703 (Debian prerelease) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Gnu make 3.79.1
util-linux 2.11n
mount 2.11n
modutils 2.4.15
e2fsprogs 1.27
Linux C Library 2.2.5
Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.2.5
Procps 2.0.7
Net-tools 1.60
Console-tools 0.2.3
Sh-utils 2.0.12
Modules Loaded snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm-oss snd-ens1371 snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device snd-ac97-codec snd-pcm snd-timer snd soundcore ipt_REJECT iptable_filter ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat ip_conntrack ip_tables autofs4 cpia_usb cpia videodev serial af_packet usb-ohci usbcore 3c59x ne2k-pci 8390
---
--
____________________}John Flinchbaugh{______________________
| glynis@hjsoft.com http://www.hjsoft.com/~glynis/ |
~~Powered by Linux: Reboots are for hardware upgrades only~~
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-20 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 0:20 Linux 2.4.19-rc3 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-07-20 4:17 ` glynis [this message]
2002-07-20 9:51 ` still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3) Martin Josefsson
2002-07-22 1:43 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <002201c2e6e8$ee071d40$0201a8c0@intranet>
2003-03-10 15:03 ` John M Flinchbaugh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020720041700.GA8172@butterfly.hjsoft.com \
--to=glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.