From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Heatwole Subject: cs46xx: defaults to revision 1.03 AC97 codec Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:33:11 -0700 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020725223311.GC2919@porky> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org I noticed in cs46xx_lib.c that the cs46xx driver defaults to instructing the chip that it will be using a 1.03 revision AC97 codec versus a 2.0 revision codec. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? -- Peter Heatwole "Murphy was just a well known pessimist." ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim