From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:45:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:45:11 -0400 Received: from 12-231-243-94.client.attbi.com ([12.231.243.94]:23823 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:45:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 19:47:39 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andries Brouwer Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux-2.5.28 Message-ID: <20020728024739.GA28873@kroah.com> References: <1027553482.11881.5.camel@sonja.de.interearth.com> <20020727235726.GB26742@win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020727235726.GB26742@win.tue.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.21 (i586) Reply-By: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:38:00 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:57:26AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote: > My third candidate is USB. Systems without USB are clearly more stable. Hm, then that would imply that all of my systems are unstable :) Seriously, I don't know of any outstanding 2.5 USB issues that cause oopses right now, or effect stability. Any problems that people are having, they sure are not telling me, or the other USB developers about... thanks, greg k-h