From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 14:38:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 14:38:39 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:17157 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 14:38:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:41:57 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Morton , lkml Subject: Re: [patch 11/13] don't hold i_sem during O_DIRECT writes to blockdevs Message-ID: <20020728194157.A15466@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , lkml References: <3D439E43.5F2DEE3D@zip.com.au> <20020728120611.A7332@infradead.org> <3D44302C.1082D6DC@zip.com.au> <20020728190544.A14314@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020728190544.A14314@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 07:05:44PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 07:05:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > And I think we can expect reasonable ulimits for root nowdays, although > I'm open for discussions on that one. Forget about this one - I remembered the code wrongly.