All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC: /proc/pci removal?
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:17:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020729131717.A25451@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)

Hi,

I seem to vaguely remember that a while ago (2.3 days?) there was
discussion about removing /proc/pci in favour of the lspci output,
however there doesn't seem much in google groups about it (and marc
seems useless with non-alphanumeric searches.)

Can anyone remember the consensus?  I seem to remember it wasn't
removed for 2.4 because certain distros rely on /proc/pci rather
than using pciutils.

I'm asking this question for purely self-centered reasons; I'd
personally rather get bug reports with the output of lspci -vv
and lspci -vvb rather than /proc/pci.  On machines where bus
addresses != kernel cookies, lspci is more than invaluable.

(Ok, so we could "fix" the bug reporters to stop whinging about
having to "port" lspci to their hardware, but that is a larger,
harder problem to solve.)

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


             reply	other threads:[~2002-07-29 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-29 12:17 Russell King [this message]
2002-07-29 12:19 ` RFC: /proc/pci removal? Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-29 12:46   ` Thierry Vignaud
2002-07-29 13:06     ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-29 13:29 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-29 16:23   ` Martin Mares
2002-07-31 17:50     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020729131717.A25451@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.