From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:26:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:26:17 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:64517 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:26:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:29:38 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Russell King Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: /proc/pci removal? Message-ID: <20020729152938.G17798@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020729131717.A25451@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020729131717.A25451@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk@arm.linux.org.uk on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:17:17PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:17:17PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > I seem to vaguely remember that a while ago (2.3 days?) there was > discussion about removing /proc/pci in favour of the lspci output, > however there doesn't seem much in google groups about it (and marc > seems useless with non-alphanumeric searches.) > > Can anyone remember the consensus? ISTR Linus was quite attached to it, so it got un-obsoleted. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs